Autologous Blood-Derived Products (ABDPs) for the Treatment of Chronic Wounds.

Autologous blood-derived therapies have emerged as a unique and promising treatment option for chronic wounds. From whole blood clots to spun-down clot constituents, these therapies are highly versatile and tend to have a lower cost profile, allow for point-of-service preparation, and inherently carry minimal to no risk of rejection or allergic reaction when compared to many alternative cellular and matrix-like products. Subsequently, a diversity of processing systems, devices, and kits have surfaced on the market for preparing autologous blood-derived products (ABDPs) and many have demonstrated preclinical and clinical efficacy in facilitating chronic wound healing. However, not all ABDPs are created equal, and the lack of standardization among product formulations and cell concentrations as well as varying complexities in preparation protocols has led to unreliable substrate viabilities and overall inconsistent conclusions on efficacy. Additionally, external factors, such as the ease of drawing blood, the health of a patient's blood, and the reimbursement landscape have dissuaded some practitioners from incorporating ABDPs into an algorithm of care for recalcitrant wounds. Here, we attempt to categorize ABDPs into "classes" and examine their efficacy, advantages, and limitations when used as both a primary therapy and an adjunct for treating chronic wounds as well as comment on some potential considerations that may help gear future product development and application.

Skin Substitutes and Autograft Techniques: Temporary and Permanent Coverage Solutions.

Coverage of burn wounds is crucial to prevent sequalae including dehydration, wound infection, sepsis, shock, scarring, and contracture. To this end, numerous temporary and permanent options for coverage of burn wounds have been described. Temporary options for burn coverage include synthetic dressings, allografts, and xenografts. Permanent burn coverage can be achieved through skin substitutes, cultured epithelial autograft, ReCell, amnion, and autografting. Here, we aim to summarize the available options for burn coverage, as well as important considerations that must be made when choosing the best reconstructive option for a particular patient.

The impact of different co-morbidities on clinical outcomes and resource utilization in critically ill burn and surgical patients: A population-based analysis of social determinants of health.

BACKGROUND: This study aims to establish the significance of social determinants of health and prevalent co-morbidities on multiple indicators for quality of care in patients admitted to the Burn and Surgical Intensive Care Unit (ICU). METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of population group data for patients admitted at the Burn and Surgical ICU from January 1, 2016, to November 18, 2019. The primary outcomes were length of hospital stay (LOS), mortality, 30-day readmission, and hospital charges. Pearson's chi-square test for categorical variables and t-test for continuous variables were used to compare population health groups. RESULTS: We analyzed a total of 487 burn and 510 surgical patients. When comparing ICU patients, we observed significantly higher mean hospital charges and length of stay (LOS) in BICU v. SICU patients with a history of mental health ($93,259.40 v. $50,503.36, p = 0.013 and 16.28 v. 9.16 days, p = 0.0085), end-stage-renal-disease (ESRD) ($653,871.05 v. $75,746.35, p = 0.0047 and 96.15 v. 17.53 days, p = 0.0104), sepsis ($267,979.60 v. $99,154.41, p = <0.001 and 39.1 v. 18.42 days, p = 0.0043), and venous thromboembolism (VTE) ($757,740.50 v. $117,816.40, p = <0.001 and 93.11 v. 20.21 days, p = 0.002). Also, higher mortality was observed in burn patients with ESRD, ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI), sepsis, VTE, and diabetes mellitus. 30-day-readmissions were greater among burn patients with a history of mental health, drug dependence, heart failure, and diabetes mellitus. CONCLUSIONS: Our study provides new insights into the variability of outcomes between burn patients treated in different critical care settings, underlining the influence of comorbidities on these outcomes. By comparing burn patients in the BICU with those in the SICU, we aim to highlight how differences in patient backgrounds, including the quality of care received, contribute to these outcomes. This comparison underscores the need for tailored healthcare strategies that consider the unique challenges faced by each patient group, aiming to mitigate disparities in health outcomes and healthcare spending. Further research to develop relevant and timely interventions that can improve these outcomes.

Orbital Fracture Characteristics and Outcomes in Baltimore.

Fracture characteristics and postoperative outcomes of patients presenting with orbital fractures in Baltimore remain poorly investigated. The purpose of our study was to determine the fracture patterns, etiologies, and postoperative outcomes of patients treated for orbital fractures at 2 level I trauma centers in Baltimore. A retrospective cohort study was conducted on patients who underwent orbital fracture repair at the R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center and the Johns Hopkins Hospital from January 2015 to December 2019. Of 374 patients, 179 (47.9%) had orbital fractures due to violent trauma, 252 (67.4%) had moderate to near-total orbital fractures, 345 (92.2%) had orbital floor involvement, and 338 (90.4%) had concomitant neurological symptoms/signs. Almost half of the patients had at least one postoperative ocular symptom/sign [n = 163/333 (48.9%)]. Patients who had orbital fractures due to violent trauma were more likely to develop postoperative ocular symptoms/signs compared with those who had orbital fractures due to nonviolent trauma [n = 88/154 (57.1%), n = 75/179 (41.9%); P = 0.006]. After controlling for factors pertaining to injury severity, there was no significant difference in patient throughput or incidence of any postoperative ocular symptom/sign after repair between the two centers. Timely management of patients with orbital fractures due to violent trauma is crucial to mitigate the risk of postoperative ocular symptoms/signs.

The Shunt Valve Recession Technique as a Neuroplastic Surgery Adjunct in Complex and High-Risk Shunt Revisions: Technical Note and Case Series.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Ventricular shunting is one of the most common procedures in neurosurgery. However, complications and revisions are frequent. Patients requiring multiple revisions often suffer secondary issues with scalp healing over hardware. Many common ventricular shunt valves have an obligate thickness that creates a visible protrusion and can potentially cause local tissue ischemia and breakdown in the setting of repeated surgery. The authors present a simple technique for recessing the shunt valve into the underlying bone to alleviate protrusion in high-risk cases. Three example cases utilizing this technique are presented. METHODS: The skull directly underlying the planned valve site is uniformly recessed with a cutting burr several millimeters as desired while maintaining the inner cortical bone layer. The valve is fixed with standard cranial plating hardware. EXPECTED OUTCOMES: Three patients are reported who underwent shunt valve recession as an adjunct to their shunt revision with neuroplastic surgery assistance. All patients had undergone multiple prior surgeries that had resulted in thin and high-risk fragile scalp. In 1 patient, the prior valve was eroding through the scalp before the described revision. All patients had satisfactory cosmetic outcomes, and there were no revisions in the 2-month follow-up period. DISCUSSION: Complex and high-risk ventricular shunt patients should be considered for shunt valve recession into the bone to reduce wound-related complications and enhance healing. This is a technically simple, safe, and effective technique to include as a neuroplastic adjunct.

Prior COVID-19 Infection Predisposes to Worse Outcomes After Autologous Breast Reconstruction: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Major shifts in health care systems worldwide have occurred because of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). With nearly half of all Americans now having a history of COVID-19 infection, there is a pressing need to better understand the importance of prior COVID-19 infection as a potential surgical risk factor. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of a history of prior COVID-19 infection on patient outcomes after autologous breast reconstruction. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study using the TriNetX research database, which contains deidentified patient records from 58 participating international health care organizations. All patients who underwent autologous breast reconstruction between March 1, 2020, and April 9, 2022, were included and were grouped based on history of a prior COVID-19 infection. Demographic, preoperative risk factors, and 90-day postoperative complication data were compared. Data were analyzed by propensity score-matched analysis on TriNetX. Statistical analyses were performed by Fisher exact, χ2, and Mann-Whitney U tests as appropriate. Significance was set at P values of <0.05. RESULTS: Patients with a history of autologous breast reconstruction within our temporal study window (N = 3215) were divided into groups with (n = 281) and without (n = 3603) a prior COVID-19 diagnosis. Nonmatched patients with prior COVID-19 had increased rates of select 90-day postoperative complications, including wound dehiscence, contour deformities, thrombotic events, any surgical site complications, and any complications overall. Use of anticoagulant, antimicrobial, and opioid medications was also found to be higher in those with prior COVID-19.After performing propensity-score matching, each cohort consisted of 281 patients without statistically significant differences between any baseline characteristics. When comparing outcomes between matched cohorts, patients with a history of COVID-19 had increased rates of wound dehiscence (odds ratio [OR], 1.90; P = 0.030), thrombotic events (OR, 2.83; P = 0.0031), and any complications (OR, 1.52; P = 0.037). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that prior COVID-19 infection is a significant risk factor for adverse outcomes after autologous breast reconstruction. Patients with a history of COVID-19 have 183% higher odds of postoperative thromboembolic events, warranting careful patient selection and postoperative management.

Invasive Non-Candida Fungal Infections in Acute Burns-A 13-Year Review of a Single Institution and Review of the Literature.

The past decade has demonstrated increased burn wound infections with atypical invasive fungal organisms. The range of previously regiospecific organisms has expanded, and plant pathogens are increasingly represented. Our institution sought to examine changes in severe fungal non-Candida infections in our patients, via retrospective review of patients admitted to our burn center from 2008 to 2021. We identified 37 patients with atypical invasive fungal infections. Non-Candida genera included Aspergillus (23), Fusarium (8), Mucor (6), and 13 cases of 11 different species, including the second-ever human case of Petriella setifera. Three fungi were resistant to at least one antifungal. Concomitant infections included Candida (19), Staphylococcus and Streptococcus (14), Enterococcus and Enterobacter (13), Pseudomonas (9), and 14 additional genera. Complete data was available for 18 patients, who had a median of 3.0 (IQR 8.5, range 0-15) additional bacteria required a median of 1 (IQR 7, range 0-14) systemic antibacterials and 2 (IQR 2.5, range 0-4) systemic antifungals. One case of total-drug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa required bacteriophage treatment. One case of Treponema pallidum was found in infected burn wound tissue. Every patient required Infectious Disease consultation. Eight patients became bacteremic and one developed Candida fermentatifungemia. There were five patient deaths (13.8%), all due to overwhelming polymicrobial infection. Burn patients with atypical invasive fungal infections can have severe concomitant polymicrobial infections and multidrug resistance with fatal results. Early Infectious Disease consultation and aggressive treatment is critical. Further characterization of these patients may provide better understanding of risk factors and ideal treatmentpatterns.

Revitalizing Hands: A Comprehensive Review of Anatomy and Treatment Options for Hand Rejuvenation.

Dorsal hand rejuvenation is gaining popularity as a solitary procedure and adjunct to face and neck rejuvenation treatments. As the hands age, the skin loses elasticity and becomes more translucent, the veins, joints, and tendons appear more prominent, and the bones become more noticeable. These changes are due to intrinsic and extrinsic factors. Current treatment methods include the injection of dermal fillers and autologous fat grafting. Anatomic studies to ensure the successful implementation of rejuvenation procedures identified three separate fascial layers in the dorsum, from superficial to deep. More recent re-evaluations revealed a less distinct, inseparable, sponge-like fascial layer. All authors agree that the superficial dermal layer is probably the optimal location for the injection of volumizing materials because it is free of anatomical structures. Many methods for harvesting, preparing, and injecting fat grafts to the dorsum of the hand have been described in the past three decades. Both filler and fat-graft procedures are performed on an ambulatory basis under local anesthesia. Good results with low postoperative and long-term complication rates and high patient satisfaction have been reported.

Incisional Release and Fat Grafting for the Surgical Management of Perioral Fibrosis in Scleroderma: A Technical Report and Institutional Review.

INTRODUCTION: Scleroderma (systemic sclerosis [SSc]) is a rare autoimmune, connective tissue disorder. Perioral fibrosis is a local cutaneous complication, negatively impacting functional capabilities and aesthetic satisfaction. Fat grafting has been postulated to aid in the management of SSc fibrosis thanks to stem cell enrichment. This technique's success has been demonstrated using different graft origin sites and different injection targets. We aim to demonstrate our SSc patients' success using abdominal fat and perioral target. METHODS: We queried our records for patients with preexisting SSc who underwent incisional release and fat grafting for perioral fibrosis from 2018 to 2021. For perioral release, a semisharp cannula was tunneled under the vermilion border into the vermilion and along the skin. For grafting, cannulas were used to infiltrate the fat with a retrograde filling technique in a radial-fanning manner. Their autoimmune diagnosis, anesthetic risk assessment, systemic disease complications, and degree of presenting symptoms were reviewed along with their postoperative outcomes. RESULTS: From 2018 to 2021, 16 patients diagnosed with SSc were treated with incisional release and fat grafting for the management of perioral fibrosis. Of the SSc patients, 8 presented with limited SSc, and 8 presented with diffuse SSc. The mean patient age was 54.31 years. All SSc patients presented with functional symptoms with the most common concern (n = 9) being "decreased mouth opening." Other common complaints were "difficulty eating" (n = 3) or "difficulty drinking" (n = 2). Some patients (n = 11) also presented with cosmetic concerns with "perioral rhytids" being the most common (n = 6). The mean number of systemic complications, at the time of presentation, was 3.06. The mean anesthetic risk assessment was 2.44. The average amount of fat grafted intraoperatively was 14.89 mL. Two patients with SSc required regrafting. For one patient, this was part of the original treatment plan and for the other due to fat resorption. Patients who followed up reported improved functionality and were pleased aesthetically. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with perioral fibrosis due to SSc can benefit from autologous fat grafting. Incisional release in combination with fat grafting can enhance procedure outcomes. This technique provides beneficial functional and aesthetic outcomes. Patients with both diffuse and limited disease are appropriate candidates for this procedure.

Public perception of household risks for pediatric burn injuries and assessment of management readiness.

INTRODUCTION: Children are uniquely vulnerable to injury because of near-complete dependence on caregivers. Unintentional injury is leading cause of death in children under the age of 14. Burns are one of the leading causes of accidental and preventable household injuries, with scald burns most common in younger children and flame burns in older ones. Education is a key tool to address burn prevention, but unfortunately these injuries persist. Critically, there is a paucity of literature investigating adult comprehension with respect to potential risks of household burns. To date, no study has been performed to assess management readiness for these types of injuries without seeking medical care. METHODS: Qualtrics™ surveys were distributed to laypersons via Amazon Mechanical Turk. Demographics were self-reported. The survey was divided into two parts, management knowledge, and risk identification. The management part involved a photograph of a first-degree pediatric burn injury and required identification of the degree of injury and three potential initial managements. The risk-identification section required correctly identifying the most common mechanisms of burn injury for different age groups followed by general identification of 20 household burn risks. Survey responses were analyzed using two-tailed Student's t-tests and chi-square analyses, univariate and multivariate analysis, and linear regression. RESULTS: Of the 467 respondents, the mean age was 36.57 years, and was 59.7% (279) male. Only 3.2% of respondents were able to correctly identify all 20 potential risks listed in our survey. Additionally, only 4.5% of respondents correctly identified all three appropriate initial management options (cool water, sterile gauze, and over-the-counter analgesics) without misidentifying incorrect options. However, 56.1% of respondents were able to select at least one correct management option. For image-based injury classification, the most common response was incorrectly second-degree with 216 responses (42.2%) and the second-most common response was correctly first-degree with 146 responses (31.3%). Most respondents claimed they would not seek medical attention for the injury presented in the photograph (77.7%). When comparing the responses of individuals with children to those without, there were no statistically significant differences in ability to assess household risks for pediatric burns. For the entire population of respondents, the mean score for correctly identifying risks was 38%. CONCLUSION: This study revealed a significant gap in public awareness of household risks for pediatric burns. Furthermore, while most individuals would not seek medical care for a first-degree pediatric burn injury, they were readily available to identify proper initial management methods. This gap in knowledge and understanding of household pediatric burn injuries should be addressed with increased burn injury prevention education initiatives and more parental counseling opportunities.

Focused Wound Care Handoff Improves Burn Center Physician-Nursing Communication and Wound Care Education.

Burn patients require changing wound care routines dependent on wound characteristics and operative interventions. Order discrepancies on electronic medical systems and poor communication between providers leads to incorrect wound care treatment which can be harmful to the complex burn patient. By dedicating a daily wound care discussion for each patient involving integral components of the team: physician, charge nurse, and wound care technicians, enhanced communication amongst team members and improved patient care was noted. A single-center burn unit conducted pre- and postintervention survey of nursing staff measuring various components of wound care. The time spent on the wound care discussions were measured daily. Additional time required to conduct the rounds were minimal with nurse reported increased clarification in patient care without additional work burden. Thus, focused wound care meetings assist with communication between providers, clarification of wound care needs, and avoidance of errors without increasing strain on the team.

The Added Value of Bronchoalveolar Lavage for Pulmonary Tuberculosis Diagnosis in High-Risk Hospitalized Patients with Negative Sputum Samples.

Hospitalized patients with a high suspicion of pulmonary tuberculosis (HS-PTB) are isolated until a definite diagnosis can be determined. If doubt remains after negative sputum samples, bronchoscopy with bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) is often sought. Still, evidence of the added value of BAL in this patient population is scarce. To address this issue, we included consecutive HS-PTB patients with negative sputum samples who underwent BAL between 2017 and 2018. Chest X-rays (CXR) and CT scans were evaluated by a chest radiologist blind to the final diagnosis. Independent predictors for PTB were assessed by multivariate regression, using all positive PTB patients between 2017 and 2019 (by sputum or BAL) as a control group (n = 41). Overall, 42 HS-PTB patients were included (mean age 51 ± 9, 36% female). BAL was a viable diagnostic for PTB in three (7%) cases and for other clinically relevant pathogens in six (14%). Independent predictors for PTB were ≥2 sub-acute symptoms (adjusted OR 3.18, 95% CI 1.04-9.8), CXR upper-lobe consolidation (AOR 8.70, 95% CI 2.5-29), and centrilobular nodules in chest CT (AOR 3.96, 95% CI 1.20-13.0, p = 0.02). In conclusion, bronchoscopy with BAL in hospitalized patients with HS-PTB had a 7% added diagnostic value after negative sputum samples. Our findings highlight specific predictors for PTB diagnosis that could be used in future controlled studies to personalize the diagnostic evaluation.

Carry That Weight! The Challenge of Managing Weight Changes During Inpatient Admission for Patients With Burn Injuries ≥20% TBSA.

The hypermetabolic state of patients with ≥20% total body surface area (TBSA) causes loss of muscle mass and compromised immune function with delayed wound healing. Weight loss is most severe in patients with ≥20% TBSA with initial weight gain due to fluid resuscitation. The American Burn Association (ABA) proposed quality measures for burn injury admissions, including weight loss from admission to discharge. We assessed how our outcomes adhere to these measures and if they correlate with previously described results. We retrospectively reviewed adult admissions with ≥20% TBSA burn injuries from 2016 to 2021. Four groups were established based on %TBSA: 20% to 29% (Group 1), 30% to 39% (Group 2), 40% to 59% (Group 3), and ≥60% (Group 4). We assessed weight changes from admission to discharge and performed multivariate analyses to account for age, sex, total surgeries, and length of stay. Data from 123 patients revealed 40 with 20% to 29% TBSA, 29 with 30% to 39% TBSA, 33 with 40% to 59% TBSA, 21 with ≥60% TBSA. A significant difference in weight loss was observed when comparing Groups 1 and 2 and Groups 3 and 4 (Group 1: -3.63%, Group 2: -2%, Group 3: -9.28%, Group 4: -13.85%; P-value ≤ .05). Groups 3 and 4 had significantly longer lengths of stay compared to Groups 1 and 2 (Group 1: 32.16, Group 2: 37.5, Group 3: 71.13, Group 4: 87.18; P-value ≤ .01). Most patients that experienced weight loss during their admission had <15% weight loss. We found no significant difference in outcomes for patients receiving oxandrolone vs not. The mean weight change was -11% for patients with an overall weight loss and +5% for patients with an overall weight gain. The significant difference between the two groups was admission body mass index (BMI; loss: 30.4 kg/m2, gain: 26.0 kg/m2; P-value ≤ .05). Patients with ≥20% TBSA suffer weight changes, likely due to metabolic disturbances. Increased length of stay and higher %TBSA may be associated with greater weight loss. Patients experiencing weight gain had lower admission BMI suggesting that patients with higher BMI are more prone to weight loss. Our findings support that patients with %TBSA ≥40 are unique, requiring specialized nutritional protocols and metabolic analysis.

Changes in Burn Surgery Operative Volume and Metrics due to COVID-19.

Due to COVID-19, hospitals underwent drastic changes to operating room policy to mitigate the spread of the disease. Given these unprecedented measures, we aimed to look at the changes in operative volume and metrics of the burn surgery service at our institution. A retrospective review was conducted for operative cases and metrics for the months of March to May for 2019, 2020, and 2021, which correspond with pre-COVID, early COVID (period without elective cases), and late COVID (period with resumed elective cases). Inclusion criteria were cases related to burns. Case types and operative metrics were compared amongst the three time-periods. Compared to the hospital, the burn service had a smaller decrease in volume during early COVID (28.7% vs 50.1%) and exceeded prepandemic volumes during late COVID (+21.8% vs -4.6%). There was a significant increase in excision and grafting cases in early and late COVID periods (P < .0001 and P < .002). There was a significant decrease in laser scar procedures that persisted even during late COVID (P < .0001). The projected and actual lengths of cases significantly increased and persisted into late COVID (P < .01). COVID-19 related operating room closures led to an expected decrease in the number of operative cases. However, there was no significant decline in the number of burn specific cases. The elective cases were largely replaced with excision and grafting cases and this shift has persisted even after elective cases have resumed. This change is also reflected in increased operative times.

Outcomes of Patients with Burns Associated with Home Oxygen Therapy: An Institutional Retrospective Review.

Home oxygen therapy (HOT) burns carry high morbidity and mortality. Many patients are active smokers, which is the most frequent cause of oxygen ignition. We conducted a retrospective review at our institution to characterize demographics and outcomes in this patient population. An IRB-approved single-institution retrospective review was conducted for home oxygen therapy burn patients between July 2016 and January 2021. Demographic and clinical outcome data were compared between groups. We identified 100 patients with oxygen therapy burns. Mean age was 66.6 years with a male to female ratio of 1.3:1 and median burn surface area of 1%. In these patients, 97% were on oxygen for COPD and smoking caused 83% of burns. Thirteen were discharged from the emergency department, 35 observed for less than 24 hours, and 52 admitted. For admitted patients, 69.2% were admitted to the ICU, 37% required intubation, and 11.5% required debridement and grafting. Inhalational injury was found in 26.9% of patients, 3.9% underwent tracheostomy, and 17.3% experienced hospital complications. In-hospital mortality was 9.6% and 7.7% were discharged to hospice. 13.5% required readmission within 30 days. Admitted patients had significantly higher rates of admission to the ICU, intubation, and inhalational injury compared to those that were not admitted (P < .01). Most HOT-related burns are caused by smoking and can result in significant morbidity and mortality. Efforts to educate and encourage smoking cessation with more judicious HOT allocation would assist in preventing these unnecessary highly morbid injuries.

Clinical outcomes in 'diabese' burn patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to update the current status of clinical outcomes in diabetic (type II) and obese (BMI: 30-39.9 kg/m2) burn patients. METHODS: We adhered to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. We searched MEDLINE (PubMed), Google Scholar, Scopus, and Embase for studies related to a number of comorbidities and burn outcomes. Search terms for each of these databases are listed in the Appendix. From this search, we screened 6923 articles. Through our selection criteria, 12 articles focusing on either diabetes or obesity were selected for systematic review and meta-analysis. Data was analyzed using the "meta" package in R software to produce pooled odds ratios from the random effect model. RESULTS: Diabetic patients had 2.38 times higher odds of mortality [OR: 2.38, 95% CI:1.66, 3.41], however no statistically significant difference was found in mortality in obese patients [OR: 2.49, 95% CI: 0.36, 17.19]. Obese patients had 2.18 times higher odds of inhalation injury [95%CI: 1.23, 3.88], whereas diabetic patients did not show a difference in odds of inhalation injury [OR:1.02, 95% CI: 0.57, 1.81]. Diabetic patients had higher odds of complications resulting from infection: 5.47 times higher odds of wound, skin, or soft tissue infections [95% CI:1.97, 15.18]; 2.28 times higher odds of UTI or CAUTI [95% CI:1.50, 3.46]; and 1.78 times higher odds of pneumonia or respiratory tract infections [95% CI:1.15, 2.77]. Obese patients also had similar complications related to infection: 2.15 times higher odds of wound infection [95% CI: 1.04, 4.42] and 1.96 times higher odds of pneumonia [95% CI: 1.08, 3.56]. Other notable complications in diabetic patients were higher odds of amputation [OR: 37, 95% CI: 1.76, 779.34], respiratory failure [OR: 4.39, 95% CI: 1.85, 10.42], heart failure [OR: 6.22, 95% CI: 1.93, 20.06], and renal failure [OR: 2.95, 95% CI: 1.1, 7.86]. CONCLUSIONS: Diabetic patients have higher odds of mortality, whereas no statistically significant difference of mortality was found in obese patients. Obese patients had higher odds of inhalation injury, whereas odds of inhalation injury was unchanged in diabetic patients. Diabetic patients had higher odds of failure in multiple organs, whereas such failure in obese patients was not reported. Both diabetic and obese patients had multiple complications related to infection.

Complications With Time-to-Ambulation Following Skin Grafting for Burn Patients: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review.

Accurate models are fundamental tools for risk-stratification, therapy guidance, resource-allocation, and comparative-effectiveness research. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols increase early post-operative recovery rates in surgical patients. The uniqueness of burn injuries and their post-operative care requires developing a specialized protocol, enhanced recovery after burn surgery (ERABS). To develop such a protocol, we need to examine post-operative practices, like time-to-ambulation, and their effect on post-operative complications. We evaluated evidence supporting complications such as graft loss, thrombolytic events, and pain, relating to the timing of post-surgical ambulation. A literature search on early-ambulation and skin-grafting was performed by two independent researchers. No time limit was set for publication dates. Relevant studies relating to ambulation of adult burn patients (>18 years of age) and their post-surgical outcomes were captured using search terms. Of the 888 studies retrieved from the query, 11 were used for review and meta-analysis. Our review revealed minimal evidence exists relating to thromboembolic events and time-to-ambulation in post-operative burn patients. The evidence that does exist found no significant difference in the number of events between early- and late-ambulation groups. Increased pain during rest and ambulation was shown in patients with delayed ambulation after five or more days. One study found an increased infection rate in late-ambulatory patients. The primary conclusion from this review is that further studies must be performed examining the correlation of thromboembolic events and infection rates with post-operative time-to-ambulation. Based on current literature, early ambulation should be included as part of a future model of ERABS.

Evaluating the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerance of Silver Sulfadiazine Dressings Once Daily Versus Twice Daily in the Treatment of Burn Wounds.

Topical silver sulfadiazine (SSD) is an effective antimicrobial therapy used to prevent burn wound infection and promote healing, but the frequency of application has not been previously examined. This study compares once versus twice daily dressing changes with SSD, focusing on development of wound infections, incidence of hospital acquired complications, patient pain scores, and length of stay. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether a once-daily or twice-daily application of SSD impacts burn wound healing outcomes. Our institution maintained a twice-daily dressing change standard of care until January 1, 2019. Patients admitted after that date had their dressing changed once daily. We performed a noninferiority analysis which indicated that a sample size of 75 per group would be sufficient to detect a significant difference with a power of 0.80. Our goal is to review outcomes for 75 patients before the change-of-practice and 75 patients after. Our main outcomes recorded are wound infection, average pain scores, average daily narcotic requirements, and length-of-stay. Results from 75 pre-change-of-practice and 75 post-change-of-practice patients showed slightly better outcomes in the post-change-of-practice group. The wound-infection rates were the same for both groups (pre = 5.33%, post = 5.33%), average daily pain levels for the pre-change group were slightly higher but the difference was negligible and not statistically significant (pre = 5.27, post = 5.25), hospital-related complication rates (unrelated to wound care) were higher pre-change (pre = 10.67%, post = 6.67%), and length-of-stay, was longer in the pre-change group (pre = 11.97, post = 10.31). The amount average amount of SSD (g/day) used per patient per hospital stay was higher as well (pre = 320.14, post = 202.12). Further statistical analysis of the results, particularly in the distribution of burn type, age, and burn depth showed no discrepancy and a generalized decreased length-of-stay with once-daily SSD dressing change. Our results show that once-daily dressing changes of SSD in burn wounds have no negative impact on wound outcomes. However, it is associated with a decreased length-of-stay, decreased pain levels, and less hospital-acquired complications. A decreased length-of-stay means reduced medical expenses for the patient and the hospital. In addition, less hospital-acquired complications result in better patient recovery. Since the difference in wound outcomes is negligible and statistically insignificant, changing the standard-of-care to once daily could prove beneficial.